PQV
  • ๐Ÿ–๏ธIntroduction
    • Problem and Solution
  • Problem: Background
    • โ˜‘๏ธEvolution of Voting System
    • ๐ŸงจSybil Attack
  • Solution: PQV
    • ๐Ÿ’กProbabilistic QV
    • ๐ŸšงMathematical Proof
    • ๐Ÿค–Simulation
      • Environment
      • Results
    • ๐Ÿ”ขPQV Calculator
  • Use Cases
    • ๐Ÿ’ตQuadratic Funding
    • ๐Ÿ”‘PoS/DPoS
    • ๐ŸงฑApplications
      • LeGovernor
  • Governor C
    • ๐Ÿ›๏ธGovernor C
    • ๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐Ÿ’ปDeveloper Guides
  • Discussions
    • โ›“๏ธMulti-Chain PQV
  • References
    • Papers
  • D3LAB Media
    • Website
    • Twitter
    • Github
    • Medium
    • LinkedIn
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Simulation
  • Implementation
  1. Solution: PQV

Simulation

Similarities between PQV and QV

PreviousMathematical ProofNextEnvironment

Last updated 3 years ago

The quality of voting result should be maintained while making QV Sybil resistant. Therefore, the result of PQV and QV should be similar.

Simulation

D3LAB conducted a simulation experiment to prove similarities between QV and PQV. In the simulation we compared the voting results of three voting methods (one-person-one-vote, one-dollar-one-vote, QV) and PQV.

In order to reflect the real political situation well, the votes were randomly distributed according to Pareto distribution. Applying Pareto distribution can represent the real-world gap between rich and poor.

The result of simulation showed that QV and PQV have high similarities. For the more detailed information about simulation, please visit the github below.

Implementation

๐Ÿค–
GitHub - D3LAB-DAO/PQV-simulator: Probabilistic Quadratic Voting SimulatorGitHub
Logo